So, IÃ†â€™ve been thinking about purchasing one of these fake vagina male-masturbators for a couple weeks now but there are simply WAY too many companies claiming to have THE "most realistic" materials in their products: Ultra-Realistic (UR3), Ultra-Realistic Virtual Touch, Cyberskin, Senso material, Futurotic, Fleshlight material, and so on. Much to my surprise, I havenÃ†â€™t been able to find objective info comparing all these different fake-vagina materials anywhere on the internet, ANYWHERE at all.
None of the product reviews IÃ†â€™ve read give a sense of how one companyÃ†â€™s material compares to the other in terms of a) realistic feel of the exterior vaginal parts, b) realistic feel of the interior vaginal canal, c) tightness of insertion/canal, d) overall durability.
Now, the most important thing to me is realism of the experience, so the Wonder-Wave stuff is I guess out of the picture for the moment, even if people think itÃ†â€™s the "most pleasureable." IÃ†â€™ll probably end up getting one regardless, but right now IÃ†â€™m looking for realism...but I donÃ†â€™t want to spend $200 on the Juli Ashton butt everyone raves about.
Basically, right now IÃ†â€™m looking at the standard Fleshlight and the Aimee Sweet Cyberskin (since IÃ†â€™m addicted to that woman). If anything, the Cyberskin/UR3 models seem to definitely beat out the FLeshlight in terms of clit+lip detail.
So please, anyone who has experience with any of these other products, please chime in with your thoughts/comparisons. Thanks. And please be as objective as possible.